Fall
2016 Training
Tuesdays 5:00-6:30 PM
MH 500A
FREE* Pizza served (incl. a no-meat
option)
*courtesy of department of mathematics
See 5th floor central bulletin board for physical handouts
Always
attempt current problem sets on your own -- you get LITTLE out
of merely watching others solve them. But seeing others'
solutions in conjunction with having attempted problems
yourself is a good way to leverage your efforts and maximize
your development of skills
PAST UMOMC Contests, Solutions
2005 UMOMC
2006
PRACTISE PROBLEMS (Archived)
Practise Problem Set #1
Yes, this was
the
2005 CMO (a high-level Canadian High School contest)
Practise Problem Set #2
Practise Problem Set #3
Practise Problem Set #4
Practise Problem Set #5
2005 NCS All-Day
practise problems (with solutions)
UM Putnam and NCS/MAA contest HALL OF FAME
(to be updated!)
What little I (R.
Craigen) know about the prehistory of mathletics at U of M:
- Barry Wolk was a Putnam Fellow while enrolled here
in 1961 (unofficially we know his score was highest, although
this information is not publicly released with the rankings --
Putnam Fellows are listed in no particular order). That
year U of M ranked fourth -- our highest ranking to date.
Barry still drops in on our sessions and shares his expertise
with the latest crop of aspiring Putnam Fellows.
- In some other year, unknown to me, but prior to 1963, U
of M achieved a team Honourable Mention.
- Sometime in the 1970's
Dr.
Tom Kucera (an undergraduate student at the University of
Manitoba at the time), received an individual Honourable
Mention.
-
Dr.
Nathan Mendelsohn, a longtime member of our department who
recently passed away, was part of the (U. Toronto) team which
won the very first Putnam competition many years ago and for
decades served on the problems selection committee for the
Putnam exam.
When I arrived in 1999 U of M students had not participated in
Mathletics competitions for a few years (nobody has ever
clarified how many).
Those with a history here: Please add to my meagre
knowledge here ...
Since then, here's how we've done:
1999:
Putnam team rank:
80th
Top ranking UM student:
Mark Wiebe (203rd)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM1: Matthew Greenberg, Mark Wiebe,
Kurt Thompson (2nd)
2000:
Putnam team rank:
121st
Top ranking UM student:
Craig Kasper (245th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM 2Geeks&aNerd: Mark Wiebe, Kurt
Thompson, Dan Nielson (4th)
UM Crablegs: Tim Nikkel, Delene Matula,
Evan Janzen Roth (10th)
2001:
Putnam team rank:
69th
Top ranking UM student:
Matthew Hasselfield (494th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM TBA: Xi Wang, Matthew Hasselfield,
Tim Nikkel (tie for 2nd/3rd)
UM MetricallySpaced: Roger Woodford,
Nick Harland, Dan Potter (4th)
2002:
Putnam team rank:
23rd
Top ranking UM student:
Matthew Hasselfield (111th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM DuckDuckGauss: Tim Nikkel, Matthew
Hasselfield, Xi Wang (tie for 2nd/3rd)
UM Metrically Spaced: Nick Harland,
Roger Woodford, Stephanie Richards (tie for 2nd/3rd)
2003:
Putnam team rank:
N/A
Top ranking UM student:
Karen Johannson (641st)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM InsertNameHere: Mike deDenus,
Gabriel Faucher, Anh Le (5th)
UM BarsbyBunch: Mike Lipnowski, Will
Guest, David Liu (tie for 6th/7th)
UM CompactTorus: Karen Johannson, Tim
Nikkel, Mercedes Scott (10th)
2004:
Putnam team rank:
66th
Top ranking UM student:
Trevor Wares (778th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM Shire: Trevor Wares, Will Guest, Anh
Le (3rd)
2005:
Putnam team rank:
N/A
Top ranking UM student:
Will Guest (483rd)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM Pi Ladies: Trevor Wares, Anh Le, Ed
Knapp (4th)
UM BecauseWeSaidSo: Will Guest,
Jonathan Lee, Michael Himbeault (6th)
2006:
Putnam team rank:
51st
Top ranking UM student:
Will Guest & Trevor Wares (tie, 747th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings: none ("Team X" ranked 12th)
2007:
Putnam team rank:
150th
Top ranking UM student:
Ruiqiong Liu (503rd)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UM CJ: Ruiqiong Liu, Garrett Klus (8th)
2008:
COMC Winner:
Ruiqiong
(Richard)
Liu
Putnam team rank:
71st
Top ranking UM student:
Garrett Klus (619th)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings: none ("UManitobaTeamA"
ranked 17th)
2009:
COMC Winner:
Todd
Sierens
Putnam team rank:
85th (out of 546)
Top ranking UM student:
Liji Huang & Yuchen Mu (tied at 892nd)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings:
UManA: Liji Huang, Yuchen Mu and Duy Nguyen
(9th)
2010:
COMC Winner:
Mak
Ka Tsun
Putnam team rank:
(N/A)
Top ranking UM student:
(N/A)
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings: none (top team: 26th)
2011:
COMC Winner:
Kevin Mather
Putnam team rank:
(N/A)
Top ranking UM student:
Suraj Srinivasan
UM teams with top 10
NCS/MAA rankings: none (two teams in top 20
)
2012-2015: To be updated
CONTEXT OF RANKINGS:
- Generally there are about 500 institutions
competing in the Putnam, so top 100 ranking ≈ top 20%.
- "N/A" generally means one or more of the 3
students preselected for our Putnam team obtained a score of
0.
Other team members and students
we hadn't selected for the team may still have done quite well.
- There are about 4000 individual participants
in the Putnam exam, so a rank in the 1000 means top 25% (out of
an already select group!).
- About 70 teams participate each year in the
NCS/MAA contest.
SOME THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW
First, never memorize a mathematical tool without:
- being prepared to prove it on demand or else knowing for
sure that it is well-known but difficult to prove in an
elementary fashion
- learning how it can be exploited and how to recognize
places where it might apply (i.e., by solving hard problems
with it)
Second, practice! A "natural" problem solver will do
moderately well without much preparation, but nobody will
distinguish themselves without preparing and working on problems
for months in advance to become familiar with problem types and
tools, and to keep one's brain "in the groove". At our
practice sessions we provide tools and experiences that have
proven to be most effective in preparation. A musician may
be good but cannot play the sonata without many hours of scales
and arpeggios; an athlete may be a backyard jock but won't shine
in varsity athletics without running drills all season with
their teammates. In the same way a mathlete may be
naturally "good" but will not distinguish themselves without
deliberately laying a foundation of basics and honing their
skills.
Third, your brain is not separate from your body. Eat
well; get plenty of sleep -- especially before competitions --
and exercise; manage the stress in your life; maintain a
positive attitude, approach each question with confidence, and
enjoy your mathletics activities.
Some outside links to fundamental tools (come to the
weekly practise for help with these and much more!)
Jensen's
Inequality (NOTE: Possibly the most powerful
and versatile inequality. Learn to master all the ideas in
it: convexity, means, etc.)
Pick's
Theorem (A crazy fact about polygons with
vertices on the integer lattice. It is subtlely behind
many contest problems -- learn to recognize it even when it is
masked)
Cauchy-Schwartz
Inequality (Absolutely fundamental)
AM-GM
inequality (You can't get along in contests without at
least this.)
Fermat's Little Theorem (and Gauss' Generalization)
Modular arithmetic and various standard tricks with it
Viete's relations (between the roots of a polynomial and its
coefficients) -- and how they are exploited
The pigeonhole principle (Simple yet versatile. More
profound than it sounds at first)
Power of an inside/outside point (Makes light work of many
geometry problems!)
Heron's formula for the area of a triangle (An old formula
for the area of a triangle; a good thing to know for triangle
problems)
Properties of matrix determinants (Knowing some of these
solves nasty-looking problems with a light touch).
...email me some
additions/links for this list...