UofM logo  

Department of Mathematics

Rings and Modules Seminar
~ Abstracts ~

R. Padmanabhan and A. Clay
Ranganathan(dot)Padmanabhan(at)umanitoba(dot)ca
Adam(dot)Clay(at)umanitoba(dot)ca
© 2023, The Authors

University of Manitoba

Tuesday, March 07, 14, 2023

Analogs of Mumford-Ramanujam Theorem for Universal Algebras
Part I: History and Examples
Part II: Structure Theorems
Abstract:

A well-known result in quasigroup theory says that an associative quasigroup is a group, i.e. in quasigroups, associativity forces the existence of an identity element. The converse is, of course, far from being true, as there are many, many non-associative loops. However, a remarkable theorem due to David Mumford and C.P. Ramanujam says that in a projective variety \(V\), if a binary law of composition \(m\) merely possessed a 2-sided identity \( m(x, e) = m(e, x) = x \), then \(m\) must also have an inverse and satisfy the associative law, hence make \(V\) into a group. Motivated by this result, we define a universal algebra \( (A;\ F)\) to be an MR-algebra if whenever a binary term-function \( m(x, y) \) admits a two-sided identity, then the reduct \( (A, m(x, y)) \) must be associative. Here we give some non-trivial varieties of quasigroups, groups, rings, fields and lattices which are MR-algebras. For example, every MR-quasigroup must be isotopic to a group, MR-groups are exactly the nilpotent groups of class 2, while commutative rings and complemented lattices are MR-algebras if and only if they are Boolean.

References:

  1. Garrett Birkhoff, Lattice Theory. Third edition. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Vol. XXV. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1967.
  2. Joel V. Brawley, Shuhong Gao, and Donald Mills, Associative rational functions in two variables, In Finite Fields and Applications (Augsburg, 1999), 43–56. Springer, Berlin, 2001.
  3. T. Evans, A note on the associative law, J. London Math. Soc., (25) 196–201, 1950.
  4. S. Fajtlowicz, On fundamental operations in groups, J. Austral. Math. Soc., (14) 445–447, 1972.
  5. K. Glazek and B. Gleichgewicht, On 3-semigroups and 3-groups polynomial-derived from integral domains, Semigroup Forum, (32(1)) 61–70, 1985.
  6. George Grätzer, Universal algebra. Springer, New York, second edition, 2008.
  7. Lowell A. Hinrichs, Ivan Niven, and C. L. Vanden Eynden, Fields defined by polynomials, Pacific J. Math., (14) 537–545, 1964.
  8. A. Hulanicki and S. Swierczkowski, On group operations other than \(xy\) or \(yx\), Publ. Math. Debrecen, (9) 142–148, 1962.
  9. David Mumford, Abelian varieties. vol. 5, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, New Delhi, 2008.
  10. Hanna Neumann, On a question of Kertesz, Publ. Math. Debrecen, (8) 75–78, 1961.
  11. Robert W. Quackenbush, Quasi-ane algebras, Alg. Universalis, (20(3)) 318–327, 1985.


Return to the Seminar page.
This page maintained by thomas.kucera@umanitoba.ca. Page source © 2015–2021 Thomas G. Kucera. Abstract © the author.