136.330 Test 1.

(October 2, 2002)

Justify all your answers unless otherwise stated.

 

1. Suppose ,  are two sets and suppose that ,  and  are mapping defined as follows:

(a) Which of the mappings  are one-to-one, which are onto? (Just give answers; no need of any justification).

(b) Find  (this means, find what  does to every element in its domain).

 

Solution.

(a)  are bijections (so one-to-one and onto);  is onto but not one-to-one.

(b) Notice that  is the following map (see  above, and follow the mapping arrow in the opposite direction): . So it happens that . Now we compute: , ,  and .

           

2. In a set of 12 people (denoted by ) any two are of different heights, with Michael being the tallest of all. Define an operation (denoted by ) by: if  and  are different people then  = that taller of  and ; otherwise ). 

 

            (a) Is  commutative ? (justify in no more than 2 sentences)

            (b) Is  associative ? (justify in no more than 2 sentences)

            (c) Is there the identity element ? If yes, describe it.

            (d) Which elements (people) are invertible?

 

Solution. (a) The operation  is obviously commutative.

(b) The operation  is associative: the result of multiplying any three elements (people) in any order whatsoever is the tallest person.

(c) The shortest person is the identity.

(d) The shortest person is the only invertible element.

 

3. Suppose  and suppose that we know that  is group (that is, the set , together with the operation  is a group). Suppose in addition that the following is a partially completed Cayley table of .

 

Complete the Cayley table of . No need to justify your answer here.

Solution.  

 

4. Suppose  is an Abelian group with identity , and suppose  is the subset of  consisting of those elements  for which . Define  over  as follows: for any , .

(a) Show that  is an operation over .

(b) Show that  with  is an Abelian group.

 

Solution.

(a) We need to show that given ,  is also in . Since , and because of the definition of , we need to show that . We have , where in the first step we have used the commutativity and associativity of .

(b)  (associativity);  (so  is in );

 and  (so  is the identity); for ,  so each element is the inverse of itself; finally  (commutativity).

 

5. (a) Write  () in cycle notation (without the symbol for inverse).

    (b) For which values of , , will every -cycle  be its own inverse?

 

Solution. (a) Using the usual notation for permutations, the cycle  is the permutation  (with the other elements fixed). From there we see that . Now we find that  (or, which is the same, ).

 

(b) With the above notation, we see that , while . So, these two are not equal if . On the other hand, it is obvious that for  we have . So, only for , every -cycle  is its own inverse.